Improvement of the express diagnostics of the production activity of the enterprise taking into account the method of determining the optimal production programs in the operational management system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.147968

Keywords:

production activity of the enterprise, production program of the enterprise, operational management, express diagnostics of the enterprise, management decisions

Abstract

The object of research is the features of the formation and use of the system for express diagnostics of production activities (based on business indicators) and the determination of the optimal production programs of an enterprise in the operational management system. One of the main problems of building effective systems for express-diagnosing production activities at enterprises is the selection of a specific list and composition of diagnostic business indicators and criteria for their optimality. It is important to have a meaningful formulation and solution of the problem: definition of optimal production programs according to the financial criterion for the development of an enterprise in the operational management system. The construction and implementation of effective systems for express diagnostics of production activities at enterprises is also accompanied by a set of interrelated problems of organizational, personnel, technical, technological, temporary and economic nature.

The methods of generalization, systematization, system analysis and economic and mathematical modeling were used, on the basis of which:

1) a system of business indicators for express diagnostics of the enterprise’s production activities is formed;

2) it is determined, from the set of permissible variants of the enterprise’s production program, that variant which satisfies the conditions of work and production and optimizes the objective function to ensure maximum profit.

It is established that the end result of the production activity of an enterprise is obtaining an integral effect (result), the main structural components of which are the following types of effects: economic, social, budget, environmental, resource effect, intellectual, scientific and technical.

On the basis of the conducted research, on the basis of the set goals and tasks, the system of express diagnostics of the production activity of the enterprise, taking into account the economic and mathematical method of determining the optimal production programs in the operational management system, is improved. The key diagnostic business indicators of the system for express diagnostics of the enterprise’s production activities are: the volume of marketable products, the volume of gross output, the volume of work in progress, the share of rejects in marketable products, the optimal production program in the operational management system.

Considering the presented improved economic and mathematical method of determining the optimal production programs (in management), a necessary condition for the development of a production enterprise is the optimal ratio of the volume of production (sales) of products with costs. And also with the absolute financial criterion of maximization (development) – the net profit of the enterprise. Here an important place is occupied by the difference of the accounting and economic approach to the calculation of profit.

Author Biographies

Ruslan Skrynkovskyy, Lviv University of Business and Law, 99, Kulparkіvska str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79021

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economy and Information Technology

Nataliya Pavlenchyk, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, 11, Kostiushko str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

Doctor of Economic Science, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Economics and Management

Fedir Horbonos, Lviv University of Business and Law, 99, Kulparkіvska str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79021

Doctor of Economic Science, Professor, Rector

Tetiana Protsiuk, Academy of Financial Monitoring, 24, Biloruska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04050

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Center

Training Center for Public Authorities and International Cooperation

References

  1. Pavlovski, H. (2017). Rozvytok systemy upravlinskoi diahnostyky pidpryiemstva. Lviv: Lvivskyi universytet biznesu ta prava, 218. Available at: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ASUA/1257760
  2. Skrynkovskyi, R. M. (2015). Systema diahnostyky vyrobnychoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva z urakhuvanniam naukovo-tekhnichnoho ta innovatsiinoho rozvytku. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 5, 51–53. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecde_2015_5_12
  3. Melnyk, O. H. (2010). Systemy diahnostyky diialnosti mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv: polikryterialna kontseptsiia ta instrumentarii. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 344.
  4. Schemann, W. F., Lingle, J. H. (1999). Bullseye! Hitting Strategy Targets Trough High-Impact Measurement. The Metrus Group, Inc., 220.
  5. Peter F Drucker on Management (1997). Journal of East European Management Studies, 2 (1), 79–96. doi: http://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-1997-1-79
  6. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1996). Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy. California Management Review, 39 (1), 53–79. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
  7. Rapoport, V. Sh. (1991). Diagnostika upravleniya. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 244.
  8. Vasilenko, V. A. (2006). Diagnostika ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiy. Kyiv: Tsentr uchebnoy literatury, 184.
  9. Melnyk, O. H. (2009). Kharakterni osoblyvosti polikryterialnykh system diahnostyky diialnosti mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstv. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia, 640, 348–354. Available at: http://vlp.com.ua/node/3184
  10. Ishchuk, S. O. (2006). Metody vyznachennia optymalnykh vyrobnychykh prohram za finansovymy kryteriiamy rozvytku pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia, 4, 123–132. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/19831
  11. Zaborovets, O. P., Losytska, M. O., Shevchenko, T. Ye. (2009). Pobudova optymalnoi vyrobnychoi prohramy promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU «KPI», 6, 436–442. Available at: http://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/8268
  12. Holov, S. F. (2007). Bukhhalterskyi oblik v Ukraini: analiz stanu ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 522.
  13. Kravchenko, O. A., Ilnytskyi, V. V., Ulianovskyi, O. I. (2013). Zabezpechennia rezultatyvnosti i efektyvnosti vyrobnychoi diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika: realii chasu, 3 (8), 29–35. Available at: http://economics.opu.ua/files/archive/2013/No3/29-35.pdf
  14. Horbonos, F., Skrynkovskyy, R., Protsiuk, T., Ogirko, I. (2017). Improvement of the Toolkit for Diagnosing the Enterprise's Production Program. Path of Science, 3 (12), 4015–4022. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22178/pos.29-8
  15. Skrynkovskyi, R. M. (2015). Diahnostyka vykorystannia trudovykh, materialnykh, finansovykh ta enerhetychnykh resursiv pidpryiemstva yak instrument upravlinnia elementamy yoho vyrobnycho-hospodarskoi diialnosti. Problemy ekonomiky, 1, 249–254. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pekon_2015_1_32
  16. Bondarenko, T. Yu. (2013). Analiz vyrobnychoi diialnosti v upravlinni mashynobudivnym pidpryiemstvom. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni I. I. Mechnykova, 18 (4/1), 49–52. Available at: http://visnyk-onu.od.ua/journal/2013_18_4_1/13.pdf
  17. Biben, O. I. (2014). Pidvyshchennia rivnia innovatsiinoho rozvytku ahrarnoho vyrobnytstva. Efektyvna ekonomika, 12. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3677
  18. Zamula, I. V., Ivanenko, V. O. (2011). Analiz obsiahiv vyrobnytstva promyslovoi produktsii na osnovi danykh statystychnoi zvitnosti. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 1 (19), 166–173. Available at: http://eztuir.ztu.edu.ua/123456789/4795
  19. Suprunova, I. V., Boiarskyi, Yu. I. (2011). Nezavershene vyrobnytstvo: otsinka ta oblikove vidobrazhennia. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 2 (20), 459–467. Available at: http://pbo.ztu.edu.ua/article/view/44258
  20. Pro zatverdzhennia formy derzhavnoho statystychnoho sposterezhennia No. 1P-NPP (richna) «Zvit pro vyrobnytstvo ta realizatsiiu promyslovoi produktsii» (2018). Nakaz Derzhavnoi sluzhby statystyky Ukrainy 06.07.2018. No. 131. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0131832-18
  21. Zahorodnii, A. H., Vozniuk, H. L. (2005). Finansovo-ekonomichnyi slovnyk. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», 714.
  22. Cobb, C. W., Douglas, P. H. (1928). A Theory of Production. The American Economic Review. Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 18 (1), 139–165. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811556
  23. Fandel, G. (1991). Limitational Production Functions. Theory of Production and Cost. Berlin, 111–146. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76812-5_4
  24. Oliner, S. D., Sichel, D. E. (2000). The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4), 3–22. doi: http://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.3
  25. Zasiadko, A. A., Koroliuk, S. S. (2017). Modeliuvannia maksymizatsii prybutku na osnovi vyrobnychoi funktsii Kobba-Duhlasa. Systemy obrobky informatsii, 2, 168–173. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/soi_2017_2_33
  26. Porter, M. E. (1989). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Readings in Strategic Management. London: Palgrave, 234–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_17
  27. Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. Special Issue on HBS Centennial 86 (1), 78–93. Available at: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=34522
  28. Maksymova, O. S., Maksymov, S. V., Temchenko, O. A. (2015). Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti hirnychozbahachuvalnykh kombinativ shliakhom optymizatsii yikh vyrobnychoi prohramy. Visnyk Donbaskoi derzhavnoi mashynobudivnoi akademii, 2 (35), 104–111. Available at: http://www.dgma.donetsk.ua/science_public/ddma/Herald_2(35)_2015/article/20.pdf
  29. Kuzmin, O. Ye., Alieksieiev, I. V., Melnyk, O. H., Yurynets, O. V. et. al.; Kuzmina, O. Ye. (Ed.) (2013). Protsesno-strukturovanyi menedzhment: metodolohiia ta instrumentarii. Lviv: Rastr-7, 428.
  30. Kuzmin, O. Ye. (2012). Kontseptsiia ta evoliutsiia protsesno-strukturovanoho menedzhmentu. Ekonomika: realii chasu, (2 (3)), 7–16. Available at: https://economics.opu.ua/files/archive/2012/No2/7-16.pdf
  31. Derii, V. A. (2009). Vytraty i dokhody pidpryiemstv u systemi obliku ta kontroliu. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 272. Available at: http://dspace.tneu.edu.ua/handle/316497/25095
  32. Kucher, S. (2015). Podatok na prybutok yak obiekt sotsialno-ekonomichnykh vzaiemovidnosyn «derzhava – pidpryiemstvo». Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, 3 (30), 201–212. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ptmbo_2014_3_17
  33. Yaroshenko, F. O., Melnyk, P. V., Miarkovskyi, A. I. et. al.; Azarova, M. Ya. (Ed.) (2011). Reformuvannia podatkovoi systemy Ukrainy: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. Kyiv: Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 656.
  34. Sutormina, V. M., Fedosov, V. M., Andrushchenko, V. L. (1992). Derzhava – podatky – biznes: (zi svitovoho dosvidu fiskalnoho rehuliuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky). Kyiv: Lybid, 328.
  35. Mitsenko, N. H., Kindrat, U. R. (2010). Resursne obgruntuvannia vyrobnychoi prohramy pidpryiemstva. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 20.8, 285–290. Available at: http://nltu.edu.ua/nv/Archive/2010/20_8/285_Micenko_20_8.pdf
  36. Kasatonova, I. (2015). Ohliad isnuiuchykh avtomatyzovanykh system upravlinnia resursamy pidpryiemstva. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, 11, 44–48. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/boau_2015_11_8
  37. Povidaichyk, M. M. (2014). Osoblyvosti stratehichnoho planuvannia vyrobnychoi prohramy pidpryiemstva lehkoi promyslovosti v umovakh nevyznachenosti. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika, 1 (42), 59–63. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvuuec_2014_1_13
  38. Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. No. 436-IV iz zminamy, vnesenymy zghidno iz Zakonamy Ukrainy (2018). Redaktsiia vid 10.11.2018. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15

Downloads

Published

2018-05-31

How to Cite

Skrynkovskyy, R., Pavlenchyk, N., Horbonos, F., & Protsiuk, T. (2018). Improvement of the express diagnostics of the production activity of the enterprise taking into account the method of determining the optimal production programs in the operational management system. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 6(4(44), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.147968

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4(44) (2018): Economics of enterprises

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Ruslan Skrynkovskyy, Nataliya Pavlenchyk, Fedir Horbonos, Tetiana Protsiuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.